74 National Congress Awards
21st April 2023 at 23:59 h.
Call for Awards Deadline
These awards will be presented at the Awards Ceremony of the 74th National Congress, to be held in the year 2023.
To qualify for these awards, the first author must be a member of SEORL-CCC or a member of any of the scientific associations in agreement with SEORL.
The panel that confers these awards will be appointed by the Scientific Committee of the Congress, and its decision will be unappealable. It is possible that the award may not be conferred.
In the event that several competitors win the prize on an equal footing, if it consists of a monetary award, the amount will be divided equally between them. If the prize is a free registration, it will be awarded to the first signatory of each of the winning entries.
Sending an abstract and cheking the “I wish that my abstract opts to the award” implies the acceptance of the guidelines written here. If the abstract is not presented during the designated session, the right to receive the award will be forfeit.
It consists of one prize of 1.500 € 2 prizes of 1.500 € each (subtracting the corresponding withholding from this amount) and an honour diploma
Application will be restricted to presentations in forum format accepted by the Scientific Committee to be presented at the Congress. All entries must be original and must not have been published previously, either in whole or in part.
A maximum of 5 selected works on basic or clinical research will be presented.
Once selected to participate in the session, the full paper must be emailed to congreso.premios@seorl.net in either Word or PDF format (8-10 pages, single-spaced, 12-point font), before 14th of July (deadline extended) 07th of July of 2023, 23:59h..
The tribunal will be composed of the President and General Secretary of SEORL-CCC, the President of the Training Committee and the President and members of the Research Committee.
The projects will be scored according to the following evaluation criteria:
- Originality (0-2 points): Original or highly relevant topic, especially if offering a new approach to the topic presented.
- Development of the topic (0-2 points): Clear description of the abstract. Correct explanation of the problem and of the objectives and conclusions of the abstract. Defense of the project in reply of the questions raised by the tribunal.
- Quality (0-2 points): Methodology of the abstract, statistical method, complexity Assessment of number of cases relative to the frequency of the pathology or technique.
- Practical application of the results (0-2 points): Assess possible effects of the results of the study on clinical practice.
- Relevance of Conclusions (0-2 points): Quality and relevance of the conclusions found.
- Funded project (0-2 points): 1 point will be awarded for a research project funded by a private institution, and 2 points will be awarded for a research project funded by a public institution.
WINNER
Carla V. Merma Linares
“Estudio de la microbiota tumoral, salival y fecal en el carcinoma escamoso de cabeza y cuello”
Patricia Pérez Carpena
“Cribado cognitivo y evaluación auditiva en pacientes con acúfeno crónico”
The first author, when sending the abstract, must check if he/she wishes to be considered for the award.
Posters that are eligible for the award must be sent in an electronic format before the congress begins, within the time frame indicated in the instructions for creating and sending the poster in a digital format, which you will receive together with the acceptance of your work to be presented at the congress.
These posters will be available online for the registered delegates to view and vote previous to the congress dates. The 30 posters with the most votes will be selected and notified to be exhibited during the congress, in the designated poster area, where they will be presented and defended (in the event of a draw, those with the same score as 3rd place will be selected). Sessions to present and defend posters will be 60 minutes. The author will have 2 minutes to explain the work and 3 minutes for questions and answers. The tribunal of this Forum will choose the winner according to the following evaluation criteria:
- Originality (0-2 points): Original topic, new screening techniques or surgery, infrequent clinical case, unusual cases or special characteristics, etc.
- Design (0-3 points): General design that allows the idea and conclusions of the project to be easily assessed.
- Quality (0-2 points): Images and quality graphics vs the quality of methodology employed in the most “conceptual” topics.
- Practical application of the results (0-3 points): Assess possible effects of the results of the study on clinical practice.
WINNER
María Garrote Garrote
“Sitting Up vértigo a consecuencia de canalolitiasis de brazo corto del canal semicircular posterior”
The first author, when sending the abstract, must check if he/she wishes to be considered for the award.
The videos that opt for the award must be sent in their definitive version before the start of the congress, within the time frame indicated in the instructions for creating the video which you will receive together with the acceptance of your work to be presented at the congress.
The 5 videos with the most votes will be selected to be exhibited in the session ‘Video Forum’ in the indicated room.
The tribunal of this Forum will choose the winner according to the following evaluation criteria:
-
- Originality (0-2 points): Original topic, new screening techniques or surgery, infrequent clinical case.
- Quality (0-5 points): Clarity of the explanation in the video, complete explicative content, image quality, educational content, etc.
- Practical application of the results (0-3 points): Assess possible effects of the results of the study on clinical practice.
WINNER
María del Mar Martínez Ruiz-Coello
“Resección de glomus timpánico izquierdo mediante láser fotoangiolítico azul. Presentación de un caso clínico”
It consist of a prize consisting of free registration to the 75th National Congress of the SEORL-CCC to be held in 2024.
The first author, when sending the abstract, must check if he/she wishes to be considered for the award.
The abstract will be evaluated anonymously by a tribunal composed of 5 members that do not have relation with the authors.
The 10 best Oral Abstracts will be selected and will then be presented in special presentation sessions during the congress (in the event of a draw, entries with the same score as 10th place will be presented) Works in which none of the authors are able to present will be eliminated from the competition.
The winner will be chosen according to the following criteria:
-
- Originality (0-2 points): Original or highly relevant topic, especially if offering a new approach to the topic presented.
- Development of the topic (0-3 points): Clear description of the abstract. Correct explanation of the problem and of the objectives and conclusions of the abstract.
- Quality (0-2 points): Methodology of the abstract, statistical method, complexity Assessment of number of cases relative to the frequency of the pathology or technique, etc.
- Practical application of the results (0-3 points): Assess possible effects of the results of the study on clinical practice.
The panel of this forum will be decided following the criteria of the Organising Committee.
WINNER
Juan Ignacio Riestra Ayora
“Eosinofilia tisular en pacientes con poliposis nasosinusal, diferencias anatomopatológicas según la localización de la biopsia y su implicación en la práctica clínica”
The prize will amount to €1500 (minus the corresponding withholding), for the Best Entry related to Auditory Pathology, and an honoury diploma.
The purposes of this call are to promote and stimulate research in auditory pathologies. They must be oriented to the research field and related to their prevention, diagnosis and treatment. For its evaluation, the quality of the work and its relevance will be taken into account.
Authors of the Oral abstracts sent to the congress and accepted by the Scientific Committee to be presented at the National Congress can opt to this award. It must be signed as the first author, by a member of the SEORL-CCC or an ORL Scientific Society with an agreement.
To apply to the award, once the acceptance of the abstract is confirmed, authors must send before the 15th July an abstract of about 3-5 pages, in digital format (.pdf) to congreso.premios@seorl.net with the email subject “PREMIO CÁTEDRA UCAM – AUDIO 2023”.
The projects will be scored according to the following evaluation criteria:
- Originality (1-3 points): Evaluations will be based upon an original topic, a new description or approach to the issue, and the existence of similar published works.
- Methodology (1-3 points): Points will be given for the quality of the methodology employed in the study (patients and/or studied variables, technical complexity, its relevance, statistical method, etc.).
- Practical application of the results (1-3 points): Assess the possible applications of the results of the study, in the investigation of the auditory pathology.
WINNER
This award is vacant
The prize will amount to €1500 (minus the corresponding withholding), for the Best Entry related to Vocal Pathology, and an honoury diploma.
The purposes of this call are to promote and stimulate research in voice pathologies. They must be oriented to the research field and related to their prevention, diagnosis and treatment. For its evaluation, the quality of the work and its relevance will be taken into account.
Authors of the Oral abstracts sent to the congress and accepted by the Scientific Committee to be presented at the National Congress can opt to this award.
It must be signed as the first author, by a member of the SEORL-CCC or an ORL Scientific Society with an agreement.
To apply to the award, once the acceptance of the abstract is confirmed, authors must send before the 15th July an abstract of about 3-5 pages, in digital format (.pdf) to congreso.premios@seorl.net with the email subject “PREMIO CÁTEDRA UCAM – VOZ 2023”.
The projects will be scored according to the following evaluation criteria:
- Originality (1-3 points): Evaluations will be based upon an original topic, a new description or approach to the issue, and the existence of similar published works.
- Methodology (1-3 points): Points will be given for the quality of the methodology employed in the study (patients and/or studied variables, technical complexity, its relevance, statistical method, etc.).
- Practical application of the results (1-3 points): Assess the possible applications of the results of the study, in the investigation of the auditory pathology.